Human-Centered AI & Rightful Machines
I argue that autonomous AI should be constrained by rules of right and principles of justice, and that human-centered AI needs a substantive model of rational agency—not merely a model of preference.
I work on AI ethics, rational agency, political philosophy, law, and the social conditions of human freedom.
My research asks how AI can respect human freedom and rights, and how truth, expertise, and freedom of dispute sustain a legitimate civil society.
Associate Professor of Philosophy, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo · Affiliated Faculty, Computer Science & Software Engineering
Both center on the conditions under which people can remain free and rational agents in social and technological systems.
I argue that autonomous AI should be constrained by rules of right and principles of justice, and that human-centered AI needs a substantive model of rational agency—not merely a model of preference.
Drawing on Kant and Mill, I study veracity, scientific testimony, and freedom of dispute as complementary conditions for public knowledge and legitimate political life.
A short selection; CV upon request.
I use debate mapping, structured discussion, and close engagement with students to make difficult ideas more precise and productive. With generative AI, I focus especially on preserving the judgment and intellectual autonomy that education is meant to develop.
Offical Cal Poly anonymous student evaluations of my teaching, both recent and overall, and by course. I provide this aggregate data primarily for prospective students considering taking one of my courses.
Before academic philosophy, I studied law and founded a web-development company. I later earned both an M.S. in Artificial Intelligence and a Ph.D. in Philosophy at the University of Georgia, followed by a postdoctoral fellowship in AI and Information Ethics at Northeastern.
At Cal Poly, I work across Philosophy and Computer Science & Software Engineering, direct the AI Ethics Lab, and contribute to university work on generative AI.